blake-d Digest Volume 1996 : Issue 96 Today's Topics: Re: Blake to Whitman connection? Re: Blake to Whitman connection? Re: Blake to Whitman connection? Cain and J35 Re: More Keys to Jerusalem Re:Re: Unidentified subject! Re: Cain and J35 RE: Cain and J35 2 more points on *J*38[43] -Reply Re: More Keys to Jerusalem -Reply blake on stage -Reply _MHH_ and Taste -Reply MCGANN, THE GHETTO, AND ME -Reply Re: Divisions of Blake -Reply re: 2 more points on *J*38[43] -Reply re: 2 more points on *J*38[43] -Reply -Reply/ LOS< JESUS Joseph of Arimathea -Reply Streaming Blake's Urizen Eternity and Blakean Evolution Re: Eternity and Blakean Evolution Re: Eternity and Blakean Evolution Re: Eternity and Blakean Evolution ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 27 Jul 1996 15:20:59 -0500 From: tomdill@womenscol.stephens.edu (TOM DILLINGHAM) To: blake@albion.com Subject: Re: Blake to Whitman connection? Message-Id: <96072715205915@womenscol.stephens.edu> Justin Kaplan tells us Whitman "ordered the construction of his tomb, 'a plain massive stone temple' of unpolished Quincy granite. He designed it himself, with one of William Blake's symbolic etchings, 'Death's Door' in mind." (_Walt Whitman: A Life_ 49) On pages 326-327 of the same biography, Kaplan describes Swinburne's essay and its comparisons of Blake and Whitman: "The 'points of contact and sides of likeness,' Swinburne said, were 'so many and so grave, as to afford some ground of reason to those who preach the transition of souls.' John Swinton was so captivated by the resemblances that he claimed he was able to pass off lines from Blake as coming from _Leaves of Grass_--this was not hard to do with Blake's 'Energy is the only life, and is from the Body . . . Energy is Eternal Delight.' Swinton 'asked me pointedly whether I had not met with Blake's productions in my youth,' Whitman reported. 'Quiote funny, isn't it?' He rejected but could not escape the connection and found his poems being cross-promoted with two other titles on Hotten's list, Swinburne's study of Blake and a color facsimile of _The Marriage of Heaven and Hell_." In a note, Kaplan quotes Whitman's own effort to distance himself both from claims of similarity and of influence; Whitman considers himself relatively sane by comparison, but "the sole exmaple of any direct 'influence ' is the design of Whitman's tomb which, according to Anne Gilchrist's daughter Grace, he adapted from a Blake engraving." Apparently both Swinburne and D.G. Rossetti saw affinities between Blake and Whitman, as did the Gilchrist circle (Mrs. Gilchrist corresponded with Whitman and considered him a prophet like Blake.) Allen Ginsbert has closely associated the poets in our own time (Ginsberg, sorry), and he is not alone. But Kaplan discounts the notion of any direct influence, since Whitman seems not to have known Blake's works until he was well into his own career. Paul Zweig (in _Walt Whitman: The Making of the Poet_) makes somewhat more of the connections, but only by way of parallelisms, connecting Blake and Whitman because of somewhat similar attitudes toward sexuality, toward the role of the prophetic poet, and toward the actual practice of poetry. The superficial similarity on the page of the long lines of both poets (and for that matter, of Christopher Smart--though his Jubilate was unread at that time) might suggest common prosodic ideas and Zweig explores that possibility. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 27 Jul 1996 16:44:27 -0500 From: jmichael@seraph1.sewanee.edu (J. Michael) To: blake@albion.com Subject: Re: Blake to Whitman connection? Message-Id: <9607272150.AA23429@uu6.psi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Thanks, Tom Dillingham, for some concrete data on Blake's influence on Whitman. I've always been struck by the similarity in the way both poets celebrate the body, although, as my American poetry professor once put it, "I don't think Blake ever got around to extolling armpits." To get back to my favorite topic, the city, "Crossing Brooklyn Ferry" embraces the crowd (almsot literally!) and celebrates the city's spiritual potential in a way that's much more Blakean than Wordsworthian. (It also undermines the false dichotomy between nature and the city Jennifer Michael ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 27 Jul 1996 18:57:24 -0500 From: tomdill@womenscol.stephens.edu (TOM DILLINGHAM) To: blake@albion.com Subject: Re: Blake to Whitman connection? Message-Id: <96072718572423@womenscol.stephens.edu> One more small note: In a very late (1890) letter. Whitman writes "Did I tell you that a monument designer, Phila: has bro't me a design for the Cemetary vault (do you remember Blake's 'Death'?)" The assumption is that he refers to "Death's Door," which exists in several versions, most familiarly in the sequence illustrationg Blair's _The Grave_. (The quotation is from vol. 5 of the NYU Press edition of Whitman's correspondence.) ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 27 Jul 1996 19:29:32 -0500 From: tomdill@womenscol.stephens.edu (TOM DILLINGHAM) To: blake@albion.com Subject: Cain and J35 Message-Id: <96072719293234@womenscol.stephens.edu> I should have been more specific about the suggestion of Cain as the "first flee-er" in Darlene's phrase. We know that Blake was very interested in the figure of Cain, not only because he wrote "The Ghost of Abel" in response to Lord Byron's _Cain_ but because he worked for many years on visual representations of Cain and Abel culminating in the great painting of "Adam and Eve Discovering the Body of Abel" which almost precisely illustrates the scene description at the beginning of "Ghost of Abel." Plate 15 {14} of Blake's _Milton_ shows the dead body of Abel beside the sacrificial altar, with Cain reaching toward flight. This is significant, because an answer to "Whither fleest thou"" may be found on that plate. And Milton said, I go to Eternal Death! The Nations will Follow after the detestable Gods of Priam; in pomp of warlike selfhood, contradicting and blaspheming. When will the Resurrection come; to deliver the sleeping body From corruptibility; O when Lord Jesus wilth thou come? Tarry no longer; for my soul lies at the gates of death. In _Jerusalem) Los was the friend of Albion who most loved him. In Cambridgeshire His eternal station, he is the twenty-eighth, & is four-fold. Seeing Albion had turn'd his back against the Divine Vision, Los said to Albion. Whither fleest thou? Albion replyd, I die! I go to Eternal Death! the shades of death Hover within me & beneath, and spreading themselves outside Like rocky clouds, build me a gloomy monument of woe: Will none accompany me in my death? or be a Ransom for me In that dark Valley? I have girded round my cloke, an don my feeb feet Bound these black shoes of death, & on my hands, deaths iron gloves: God hath forsaken me, & my friends are become a burden A weariness to me, & the human footstep is a terror to me. It is not merely that the phrase "I go to eternal Death" repeats here, but that the complex ironies involved in putting off selfhood and entering into death in order to overcome it are tied to the problems explored in "Ghost of Abel" and related to what it may be that [Cain] must do to escape the "life for a life" vengeance for his act. Los asks Must the Wise die for an Atonement? does Mercy endure Atonement No! It is Moral Severity, & destroys Mercy in its Victim. So speaking not yet infected with the Error & Illusion I don't mean to argue that the question "Whither fleest thou"" is meant to evoke *only* Cain (for one thing, Cain and Judas are linked typologically, I think, though I don't have the relevant texts handy to check on that), but that as is often the case, such moments bring together multiple associations; I think Jonah is possibly relevant (and "my friends are become a burden" would even justify folding in Job, though probably it evokes the guilt we might associate with Cain or Judas). It is also necessary to analyze more carefully the interesting and complex relationships between Milton 15[14] and Jerusalem 35 [39] since only the full context would justify conclusions or identifications I have suggested. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 27 Jul 1996 21:15:23 -0700 From: "Charlie K."To: blake@albion.com Subject: Re: More Keys to Jerusalem Message-Id: <199607280414.VAA21615@gost1.indirect.com> Randall Albright wrote: > Now what does THAT mean, you might think, wandering through the > multi-layered forests of "Jerusalem"? Well, for me, more > comfortable in the "Marriage of Heaven and Hell" era, it means > letting things all hang out, warts and all. I've been skimming (not really reading) all these different interpretations of Jerusalem and I thought I'd add my $.02. Jerusalem & The Marriage are two of my favorite Blake poems to read. I think they are two good examples to use when contrasting younger Blake with older Blake. The Marriage, like Jerusalem, is an epic poem, but, unlike Jerusalem, it is also a sort of academic rebuttal to Swedenborg. At the time it was written, Blake was still thinking about other current ideas of the time, building upon them, and improving them in his own way. Some of The Marriage is presented in a logical manner, such as an argument to illustrate a point. Jerusalem, on the other hand, I see as more of a pure visionary *catharsis*. Nothing academic about it. Blake had some deep stuff on his mind, the eternal stuff, and I imagine that it all would get to the point where he would just let it pour down onto the paper. The overheated brain. He would get the torments, struggles and trembling down on paper as a means not only to create art, but to feel the emotional release that catharsis brings. And his command of the language was so powerful that he could get all that emotion effectively down into words. In fact, he was so good at this that one may experience a sort of catharsis of their own simply from reading the words. And if you think about it, it's all in there in Jerusalem. Death, birth, life, sadness, the difference between the sexes, God, eternity, etc. The big stuff. True religious writing. The kind of things some people are uncomfortable even considering. Blake thought about them a lot. So I don't look for meaning or a story line when I read Jerusalem. The interaction of the characters is a symbolic way to show the interaction of different aspects of humanness. As if Blake was playing with the archetypes and writing stories about them... in eternity. Not very grounded in logic at all. Logic doesn't have much of a place in visionary inspiration. Either does time. And of course some of the politics and philosophy of the day is thrown in there too. Blake was sort of the counterforce at a time when logic and rationality were being cultivated and rewarded almost universally among the "thinkers." He used them in The Marriage to help make his point, but by the time he got to writing Jerusalem he had all but abandoned them in favor of furthering his own visionary mythology/cosmology. One thing that does puzzle me are the two different attitudes Blake displays about science. In The Marriage he speaks of science in a negative tone, while in his later works he links science with art and speaks about them together most positively, as if they stood as the highest Human achievements. Did Blake's feeling about science & experimentation change as he got older, and if so what prompted the change? And does anybody know anything about Blake's actual visionary experiences? How did Blake achieve ecstasy? Of course I may be over-simplifying, but I always tend to do that. Charlie (a person not accustomed to writing about literature) "All things Begin & End in Albions Ancient Druid Rocky Shore." ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 28 Jul 1996 02:03:04 -0500 (CDT) From: Darlene Sybert To: blake@albion.com Subject: Re:Re: Unidentified subject! Message-Id: Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Sat, 27 Jul 1996 WaHu@aol.com wrote: > What is coherence, Darlene, and who has it? He that died a'Thursday. -to > paraphrase Sir John.- In the work-a-day world, coherence usually starts at > about $13.85 an hour, with a four hour minimum. But as almost no one is > coherent for more than an hour, the actual cost is closer to $50.00 an hour. Apparently I said something about coherence...but I'm sorry I forgot what it was... Darlene Sybert http://www.missouri.edu/~c557506/index.htl University of Missouri at Columbia (English) ****************************************************************************** The world is so full of a number of things I'm sure we should all be as happy as kings.. -RLS ****************************************************************************** ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 28 Jul 1996 02:32:03 -0500 (CDT) From: Darlene Sybert To: blake@albion.com Subject: Re: Cain and J35 Message-Id: Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Thanks for expanding on Cain, Tom...and I apologize for my quip... I thought you were just being witty so I didn't even take time to consider a serious connection. I thought your explication made sense...and I'll keep it in mind while reviewing the next couple weeks--Blake and Byron both.> > Darlene Sybert http://www.missouri.edu/~c557506/index.htl University of Missouri at Columbia (English) ****************************************************************************** This return to the world...can take place only if woman is released from the archaic projections man lays upon her and if an autonomous and positive representation of female sexuality exists in the culture. -Irigaray 17 ****************************************************************************** ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 28 Jul 1996 06:00:02 -0500 (CDT) From: RPYODER@ualr.edu To: blake@albion.com Subject: RE: Cain and J35 Message-Id: <960728060002.2020bab8@ualr.edu> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Good stuff, Tom rpy ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 29 Jul 1996 09:14:12 +0200 From: P Van Schaik To: BLAKE@albion.com, RPYODER@ualr.edu Subject: 2 more points on *J*38[43] -Reply Message-Id: Dear Paul, In this case, I don't think Los is in error to urge the Eternals to try to save Albion from falling ever further into the delusions of the SElfhood. Blake describes, elsewhere, how Africa once fell into a potentially fatal `Sleep' and how he was recovered from this alluring descent into the state of Experience by divine mercy. Help comes too late for Albion, so he descends into the Selfhood and all that once was within his bosom is given permanent form in the abyss. Blake's point is that all Eternals have the freedom to contract into their Selfhoods and to fall into the deadly `Sleep' of the Soul represented by that of Albion. However, God is merciful and tries to prevent the `Sleep' from becoming dangerous to the sleeping soul , or Eternal. Thus, I see the passages in line with Blake's compassionate exploration of the relationship between God and man - not as an isolated example of irony. Albion, overcome by delusions, of course resists those who would help him back to sanity and the mental health of Innocence. Thel, unlike Albion, listens to those who would help her and is thus safely restored to the Vales of Bliss instead of falling into Experience. Ironically, however, the critics generally present her as weak in refusing to take on the challenges of mortal existence and the woes of fleshly love. Pam van Schaik ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 29 Jul 1996 09:32:34 +0200 From: P Van Schaik To: blake@albion.com, chaz@take3soft.com Subject: Re: More Keys to Jerusalem -Reply Message-Id: Dear Charlie, For someone not used to writing about literature, I think your instincts are very sound. I liked what you said very much and would like to add that , in addition to all the spirituality in Blake which you rightly perceive, there is the bonus of a story-line as the visionary vignettes he provides us with all evoke the Fall of man in a sequential, cyclical narrative form. They simulataneously try to expalin how a good God could have created a fallen world. Pam ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 29 Jul 1996 09:23:17 +0200 From: P Van Schaik To: blake@albion.com, tmkeiser@piper.hamline.edu Subject: blake on stage -Reply Message-Id: Re your query about a Blake play set in Blake's garden. I saw, about 12 years ago, a play at the Wardour Warehouse in London which opened with a nude Blake sitting in a tree in his garden. It was philosophical as Thomas Paine and his ideas figured quite largely in it. I can't remember its title. . but the Blake Society in London would know of this. Pam van Schaik ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 29 Jul 1996 12:08:24 +0200 From: P Van Schaik To: blake@albion.com Subject: _MHH_ and Taste -Reply Message-Id: >>> "The cistern contains: the fountain overflows One thought. fills immensity. Always be ready to speak your mind, and a base man will avoid you." Randall asks: Why DO children have a Disneyland-like fun ride on a serpent in "Thel" and "America"? Are they just... being TAKEN for a ride? I think that they're portrayed as having a happy ride - for a change - because all things will ultimately revert to being divinely human. As in the Lyca poem, even the Devourers of this world can become compassionate and cry tears of `gold' because, when they recover their particpation in the divine humanity, they simultaneously recover the capacity ot be merciful. Randall asks: Where's the path that the argument is talking about? Climbing up or down a tree constitutes a path? In Kabbalah, the radiances of the Tree of Life are joined by shining `paths' so, yes, the `tree' has `paths' - and so, I believe, does tha brain since neural paths are laid down by our choices and actions - some becoming virtual highways and others, the path `less-travelled'. Pam ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 29 Jul 1996 12:36:23 +0200 From: P Van Schaik To: blake@albion.com Subject: MCGANN, THE GHETTO, AND ME -Reply Message-Id: Yes,Ralph, I'll witness to the truth of all that you say in this posting. Cant and jargon and all the protean forms of political correctness that lead to the next stonified strata of society and new mental chains do need to be challenged and in doing so, I think you continue a mental struggle which Blake would have applauded. Pam ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 29 Jul 1996 12:52:22 +0200 From: P Van Schaik To: blake@albion.com, jmichael@seraph1.sewanee.edu Subject: Re: Divisions of Blake -Reply Message-Id: Just a very brief comment before leaving work on what you said re the Prolific and Devourer. Blake, I think, always equates the Devourer with characters such as the Worm in the Rose, the Tiger in the Forests of the Night and all who endorse Urizenic thinking - that is, denying the divine vision of selfless love - which, of course, includes hypocrites of all types, even in the Priesthood. The Prolific I think Blake sees as all those who continually fight against those who murder (`devour') the truth about man's divine origins and the abundant mercy of a loving God. Pam ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 29 Jul 1996 05:59:24 -0500 (CDT) From: RPYODER@ualr.edu To: BLAKE@albion.com Subject: re: 2 more points on *J*38[43] -Reply Message-Id: <960729055924.2020ce95@ualr.edu> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Thanks for the comments, Pam. Basically I agree with you that Los is not in error to urge the Friends of Albion to try to save Albion, and I also agree that this is not some isolated moment of irony, but part of Blake's exploration of the divine/human relationship. But part of that relationship is in the incongruity between what seems best to Los (or other characters) and what the Divine Will feels obliged to do. Several times in *Jerusalem* Jesus tells different characters that he must do things with which they disagree; for example, at one point he tells Jerusalem (I think) that even Vala and Luvah must be redeemed because "I cannot leave them in the gnawing grave" (quoted from memory). Also, I'm not convinced that going back into Innocence is the answer for Blake, certainly not for later Blake. It is much more a matter of going *through* the fiery furnace. I have argued elsewhere that issue is not one of organizing Innocence but of organizing Experience. Paul Yoder ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 30 Jul 1996 08:56:39 +0200 From: P Van Schaik To: BLAKE@albion.com, RPYODER@ualr.edu Subject: re: 2 more points on *J*38[43] -Reply -Reply/ LOS< JESUS Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Dear Paul, I'm glad you raise the points you do because they present problems in interpretation which I have tried to wrestle with in my own work. As I read the longer poems, the only time that Los is out of tune with the divine will is when he becomes subject to Urizenic delusion (becoming what he beholds, so that his own spectre of Selfhood rises against him). Because Los succeeds in subduing his Spectre, he is able to gather the scattered divine sparks and so help Albion recover his integrity or wholesome fullness within the divine will. Because he gathers the scattered divine light of Albion in his Furnaces, he can restore some of the beauty -even in the fallen world - of Albion. However, only Jesus, by casting himself into the Furnaces of Affliction of mortal life can, by his perfect example of selflessness, set the example in human (rather than archetypal) terms which - if mortals imitate - can redeem them from the state of Error in which they live in their Selfhoods. Jesus, of course, must redeem all of those who once lived in harmony within Albion's bosom in Eternity. He knows that sin is not what Urizen sees as sin and that those engrossed in the Selfhood on earth are simply in a state of Error which must be cast off like a rotten garment. Naturally, though, those who have assumed these rotten garments of mortal flesh are afraid to cast them off, equating these with death. Thus, both Los and Jesus can be seen as fulfilling the divine will which allows for expansion into the divine bosom and its contrary - contracting into Error. But the divine will , in mercy and pity, sets a limit to the Fall because if such a `limit' were not set, the result would be that the divine sparks of Albion would dissipate into the dark abyss, there becoming more and more `disorganiz'd' so that Albion would atomise into Eternal Death. The contrary of this is the Organization of light into its original form in Eden. I therefore see no reason to postulate an early Blake and later Blake which, in my opinion, only adds fuel to those who regard Blake as schizoid. Whle his earlier poems do have a pastoral touch reminiscent of Spencer and the `Ginat' forms of his epic are only deveoped in his longer , later poems, I see coherence of vision throughout BLake in the sense that he consistently champions that which is Christ-like within us and urges us to cast out all that is not-human, in the fullest sense of the word. Pam ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 30 Jul 1996 09:11:49 +0200 From: P Van Schaik To: blake@albion.com, jmichael@seraph1.sewanee.edu Subject: Joseph of Arimathea -Reply Message-Id: Dear Jennifer, I think you are right about Jesus accompanying Joseph of Arimathea.. I heard something similar when I was recently in Glastonbury. Also, there is, indeed, a close connection between the Lamb of God and Jerusalem because in Innocence they are `one' in will and intellect -as are all the other masculine and feminine spirits. Jerusalem is the `Bride' and `Emanation' of the Lamb and sometimes appears like a cloud of light enfolding Him like a garment, and sometimes as a lovely, rainbow winged female, and sometimes as the holy city on Mount Zion. Similarly, all the other emantions are protean in character and vary their appearance , reflecting and fulfilling every desire of their male partners. This harmony is not something which should provoke feminists to fury, but is like the yin-yang of Eastern philosophy. This view, of course, brings me into strong disagreement with those (such as Alicia Ostriker and Anne Mellors) who see Blake as giving males free rein in Eden while the females tend the children in `inferior' Beulah. Pam van Schaik, Unisa, Pretoria ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 30 Jul 1996 11:22:16 -0400 From: "Rick Van Valkenburg" To: blake@albion.com Subject: Streaming Blake's Urizen Message-Id: <19960730151524.AAA19143@ppp20.spacelab.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi. I recently discovered this list and I thought I would de-lurk to introduce myself and to inform you about the extraTEXTure Web edition of The First Book of Urizen In an attempt to make reading off a computer monitor more accessible and provide a different way to experience the words I have presented the entire text verse by verse. That is each verse is a separate file with buttons linking to the next verse or to a table of contents page. I would appreciate any feedback on this method. I was excited by the aesthetic of Blake's words streaming verse by verse through the void, but practically speaking it works best during low traffic times (although the files are small, about 1K, and tend to load fast). The URL is http://haven.ios.com/~wordup/blake/urpr.html It works well with most browsers, but surprisingly there seemed to be a problem with Netscape 1.* aligning the text properly, but it works as intended with versions 2.0 and up. grace be w/ ye, Rick van Valkenburg Publisher ////\\\\ word \\\\//// http://www.spacelab.net/~upword ////\\\\ word \\\\//// http://haven.ios.com/~wordup \\\\//// ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 30 Jul 1996 15:14:31 -0500 From: albright@world.std.com (R.H. Albright) To: blake@albion.com Subject: Eternity and Blakean Evolution Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Pam: I really like your point of view, but... I just don't see it. Eternity is made up of Time and Space, isn't it? Los and the ever-awful Enitharmon hold it all together (at least, in "Europe" she's a horror! And Los isn't exactly nice to his first-born in Book of Urizen, is he? But they CHANGE... move through STATES...). So I disagree with what you think "eternity" ALWAYS (?) is with Blake, because much of the time I find the ever-handy FIRST definitions in Damon's Blake Dictionary for "eternity" to be something to which I can relate. Your eternity sounds like the ever-after with Jesus. Am I wrong? Then... the tyger. Always a devourer? Endorsing Urizenic reasoning? What? Because it sounds like, maybe if you read later Blake, LOS, not Urizen, hammered it out in the _Songs_ poem? "The tygers of wrath of wiser then the horses of instruction."-MHH. Hey, sometimes you have to burn down a house to build a new one. So isn't this statement potentially prolific, not merely devouring? The serpent in America... are you SURE those kids aren't being taken for a ride? Orc saved the day... but what IS he, other than a fiery anarchist? If the kids are happy, someone else is crying in that last plate. Justice? Doesn't seem fair. The path that the just man is on in Marriage of Heaven and Hell... how many people, in Blake's time, would have known that definition of a "path" as climbing a tree? I see the tree as a metephor for a path only because Blake has placed it on the same plate as the description. It expands my vision of what he's describing, but literally you can't follow it... up up up... into the barren climes. Unless it's a Jack in the Beanstalk situation for him to hop off and get honey bees to sing and roar with lions. To me, if I were to follow your explanation on the last 3 points, it would reduce the elasticity of Blake... how he sometimes says one thing but draws another... as is obvious in Tyger, Tyger" and I tried to show in my Book of Urizen and Orc's Bum Rap posts (I admit these were sarcastic, but they were based on visual-verbal CONTRAST to show how Blake expands, not contracts, our doors of perception). Still, I'm interested in this all-in-one Blake theory of yours. Please... more! And plate, line # references, perhaps? Thanks- Randall Albright http://world.std.com/~albright/blake.html "Improvement makes strait roads, but the crooked roads without Improvement, are roads of Genius." ---Plate 10, line 66, "The Marriage of Heaven and Hell" ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 30 Jul 96 16:44:29 EDT From: Kevin Lewis To: blake@albion.com Subject: Re: Eternity and Blakean Evolution Message-Id: <9607302053.AA03945@uu6.psi.com> Blake did not aim for elasticity. Where could anyone ever get the idea that "eternity" is made up of time and space! Have an afternoon? Read the columns on "eternity" in the _OED_. I thought Pam's comments were insightful, learned, and unusually sensitive to the historical Blake. Kevin ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 30 Jul 1996 17:55:39 -0400 (EDT) From: "Avery F. Gaskins" To: Subject: Re: Eternity and Blakean Evolution Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: Text/plain; charset=US-ASCII The traditional view of eternity is that it is both timeless and spaceless. That is: Eternity equals Infinity. That shouldn't rule out sequences of events, but they may have now objective measurement as to length. Avery Gaskins ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 30 Jul 1996 17:57:17 -0400 (EDT) From: "Avery F. Gaskins" To: Subject: Re: Eternity and Blakean Evolution Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: Text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sorry about the typo. "now objective measurement" should be "no objective measurement." Avery Gaskins -------------------------------- End of blake-d Digest V1996 Issue #96 *************************************