blake-d Digest				Volume 1996 : Issue 84



Today's Topics:

	 Re: Quest Literature, Sci-Fi, etc. -Reply

	 Re: Quest Literature, Sci-Fi, etc. -Reply

	  Re: Experiment Pictures -Reply

	  Re: Quest Literature, Sci-Fi, etc. -Reply -Reply

	 blake in chicago?

	 Re: Quest Literature, Sci-Fi, etc. -Reply

	 Blake and the Country versus City

	 D.H. Lawrence and Blake

	 Re: Quest Literature, Sci-Fi, etc. -Reply

	 Re: Quest Literature, Sci-Fi, etc. -Reply -Reply

	 Re: sweet science

	 Re: blake in chicago?

	 Re: Blake and the Country versus City

	 Re: Blake and the Country versus City

	 Re: Blake and the Country versus City

	 Re: Blake and the Country versus City

	 RE: Blake and the Country versus City

	 Re: blake in chicago?

	  Re: Blake and the Country versus City -Reply

	 Re: BLKAKE CONTRA EMPIRICISM, OR 'THER IS NO NATURAL RELIGION'

	 Re: Blake and the Country versus City -Reply



------------------------------



Date: Tue, 9 Jul 1996 15:50:58 -0800

From: george@nowhere.georgecoates.org (George Coates)

To: blake@albion.com

Subject: Re: Quest Literature, Sci-Fi, etc. -Reply

Message-Id: 

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"



Pam van Schaik wrote;

>Hugh, I much enjoyed your statement that BLake's characters are not

>`any more developed than comic-book oafs'...



Then which of the following equivalents are most accurate and why?



Thel = Betty Boop, Olive Oil or Lois Lane?



Urizen = Dick Tracy, Bluto, Mr. Natural, Elmer Fudd, Lex Luthor, or Hagar

the Horrible?



Los = Popeye, Superman, the Green Lantern,

Steve Canyon or Zippy the Pin Head?



Orc = Sweat Pea, Charly Brown, Jimmy Olsen, Denise the Menace, or Dilbert?



Enitharmon = Lucy, Wonder Woman, or Blondie?







GC



------------------------------



Date: Wed, 10 Jul 1996 01:12:59 -0400

From: WaHu@aol.com

To: blake@albion.com

Subject: Re: Quest Literature, Sci-Fi, etc. -Reply

Message-Id: <960710011258_573439402@emout15.mail.aol.com>



All Art aspires to the condition of Betty Boop. In Betty Boop begins

responsibility.  In Xanadu did Betty Boop a stately Pleasure dome decree.  My

mother bore me in the southern wild, and I am Betty Boop, but oh my soul is

Koko the clown.Blake is sublime.  Sublimity, delicate poison flower that it

is, DEMANDS parody.  So we have Lewis Carroll doing Wordsworth: I search the

fields for Haddocks' eyes...

Parody is not the negation of Blake, or any other artist.  It is a way of

testing a product.  Like jumping up and down on a matress in the store....If

it breaks, it isnt well made, so good riddance.  You can sing pretty nearly

any Emily Dickenson poem to onward christian soldiers, yellow rose of texas

or Hernando' Hideaway.

All great song writers understand parody.

Best description of sublimity I ever heard was by Geoffrey Hartman.  I'll

look for the essay....



What are Blake's illustrations if not, literally, cartoons?  [OED:Set of

cartoons for the tapetries of the Sistine Chapel] 



After I wrote that sillyness about the tower it cleared my head.  I realized

Blake is writing stuff not more than a couple molocules different in chemical

composition from say, Cowper's The Task, but they are being performed by a

radical dance / theatre troup in the nude!  A daring 18th century innovation!

 Which explains a pet theory of mine that the Ghost of the Flea was Julian

Beck of the Living Theatre!



For my bonny Betty Boop I would lie me doon and dee...



In one Betty Boop cartoon Cab Calloway turns into a Walrus and sings St.

James Infirmary.  The first time I played it for Blake he wept and laughed

and said, "Eternity is in love with the productions of time, can I borrow

this video?"



Hugh Walthall      wahu@aol.com



------------------------------



Date: Wed, 10 Jul 1996 09:57:55 +0200

From: P Van Schaik 

To: blake@albion.com, EEB4@PSUVM.PSU.EDU

Subject:  Re: Experiment Pictures -Reply

Message-Id: 



There is a passage in which Blake equates `Science' with Architecture,

inter alia and, as Nelson Hilton points out, Los, as Urthona in Eternity

forges the `golden armour of Science' at his eternal Forge.  I think Blake

saw God as the source of all knowledge and wisdom and probably

knew that in Kabbalah the first emanation from God is equated with

Wisdom.  Los's activities in Innocence are  symbolic : his role, being the

Zoa of Imagination in Albion, is to create all the the implements used in the

fiery intellectual `mental conversations' of heaven which are so intense

that Blake sees them as `Wars of Intellect' (as opposed to the

horrendous carnal wars of mortals).  He not only forges `Swords' and

`arrows' but also implements with which to gather the golden harvests

of `knowledge' in Eternity.   (Thanks Elisa for the reminder that the

Shadowy Female is also associated with an inverted Tree.)   Pam  



------------------------------



Date: Wed, 10 Jul 1996 10:14:01 +0200

From: P Van Schaik 

To: blake@albion.com, george@nowhere.georgecoates.org

Subject:  Re: Quest Literature, Sci-Fi, etc. -Reply -Reply

Message-Id: 



George, My range of comic book characters isn't as wide as yours, so

I'd plump for:



Thel as Little Bo-Beep



Los as PopEye on account of his pumped up muscles at the Forge, but

also with a tinge of Superman since he always comes to the rescue of

frozen, cold-limbed Albion



Urizen as TinTin having a really  bad  dream



Enitharmon as the Hag-restored to -beautiful-girl a la Wife of Bath's Tale



Orc as a type of 2nd Jesus - in the shape of all Consuming Fire (that is

when he isn't chained howling Prometheus-like to the Rock of Ages).



------------------------------



Date: Wed, 10 Jul 1996 09:32:25 -0500 (CDT)

From: RPYODER@ualr.edu

To: BLAKE@albion.com

Subject: blake in chicago?

Message-Id: <960710093225.603216c0@ualr.edu>

Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT



Hi,

What can anybody tell me about Blake collections in the Chicago area?  I'm

team-teaching a course on poetry and painting in the spring, and the art 

department is considering sponsoring a trip to Chicago.  The course will

have a large component on Blake and Reynolds (the teachers' hobby-horses), so

we would like some idea of what might be available.

Thanks,

Paul Yoder



------------------------------



Date: Wed, 10 Jul 1996 07:43:06 -0700 (PDT)

From: Ralph Dumain 

To: blake@albion.com

Subject: Re: Quest Literature, Sci-Fi, etc. -Reply

Message-Id: <199607101443.HAA21536@igc4.igc.apc.org>



Did I see same parody in "Amadeus", or have you broken down under

the strain of rehearsals?  In Betty Bop begins responsibililty?

But I thought said skirt was the oothoon, the clitoral goddess of

commodity fetishism.  Oh, HUgh, it must be the strain, or is it

the storm and stress of city living in the Strictdick of

Coldhumpia?  The culture of poverty doesn;t help my morale, these

iognorant Bible-humpers get me down.  Do you feel same?  I think I

can get my bodyguard to take me into that stinking neioghborhood

to see your friggin' play.  It better be good, mate.



------------------------------



Date: Wed, 10 Jul 1996 12:26:43 -0400

From: albright@world.std.com (R.H. Albright)

To: blake@albion.com

Subject: Blake and the Country versus City

Message-Id: 

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"



Paul Yoder writes:

>As much as he and Catherine looked forward to the move (to Felpham), and

>to working with Hayley, Blake quickly became disillusioned with life at

>the beach.  Catherine was sick almost the whole time they were there;

>Blake was sick much of the time.  Moreover, it is not at all clear that

>Blake enjoyed small town life.>>>>>



Catherine was "sick" even before leaving for Felpham: exhausted, according

to Blake. But when Blake got there, according to Peter Ackroyd, "His was

one continual hyperbole of enthusiasm...." and his cottage is called by

Blake "the Spontaneous Effusion of Humanity, congenial to the wants of

Man".



True, as time went on, the damp and cold got to both of them. Maybe an

inland country setting would have been better. If only he had had a patron

in inland Somerset... truly Jesus's presence is felt around Glastonbury's

Tor, even by non-believers such as myself.



However, he still claimed that in Felpham, outside of London's hectic

world, "voices of Celestial inhabitants are more distinctly heard, & their

forms more distinctly seen, & my Cottage is also a Shadow of their houses".

(quoted in Ackroyd's _Blake_)



Changes to his artistic vision and philosophy were also happening at

Felpham, which are seen (whether you like them or not) in "Milton" and

"Jerusalem". Stuff like material world being a shadow of some eternal drama

elsewhere, mortal life and mortal part being unimportant. As Ackroyd says,

"This sounds different from his earlier celebrations of sexual energy and

radical optimism, and suggests not only that he was growing older but that

his 'mortal' hopes and aspirations were now being devalued or discounted.

Perhaps he had decided to make a virtue out of his withdrawal from the

city." (Perhaps also he had decided to make a virtue out of the incredible

failure of the French Revolution, out of his frustration even with the

American Revolution for not ridding itself of slavery and even more... like

commerce, industrialization, exploitation, and more.) Another Ackroyd

quote: "....now, having left London, his visions were true comfort. They

suggested the reassurance of a world beyond this one, and may even have

assuaged his 'Nervous Fear'." Or this: "For Blake, there now opened a

period of happy industry."



All Ackroyd quotes come from the "Felphams Vale" chapter of _Blake_



The important points are multi-fold. One is that Blake was beholden to his

patron; he wasn't FREE in this "country" and resented the condescension,

even though gently put by Hayley. Another is that this seaside place where

Hayley happened to live may not have been conducive to his and his wife's

physical health... and knowing how much mental and physical health are

intertwined, I think Mr. Yoder brings up a valid point on that issue. Yet

another is the power of regeneration that Felpham, for all its faults, held

for Blake. He re-tooled his imaginative powers there to then go on and

create the "Milton" and "Jerusalem" prophetic works.



I don't deny that London was and would be again a great place for great

creativity in Blake. He had been born and raised in London; there is often

a certain kinship to the town you know so well. (Joni Mitchell tried NYC,

but ended up back in LA, although she's originally from Alberta, Canada, to

be specific. Bowie is supposedly moving back to London, after having tried

Zurich, LA, NYC, and a thousand places in between.) But Blake's poems are

often romanticizing an ecchoing green, a shepherd on a vale,  speculating

whether Jesus walked "upon England mountains GREEN" (my capitalization) or

cities of imagination, whereas the real cities are less than favorably

painted, as in "Chimney Sweeper" and "London". The satanic wheels of

Locke/Bacon/Newton grind out industrializing "progress" there, don't they?

Quite different from nature's TRUE wheels, which are a mere shadow of the

wheels that they are a reflection of... Am I wrong?



As far as the fracas with Scofield, after which Blake was tried and

acquitted for sedition, it could have happened anywhere with Blake's

republican attitudes and stubbornness, couldn't it? What does that have to

do with country versus city life?



-Randall Albright



------------------------------



Date: Wed, 10 Jul 1996 12:29:34 -0400

From: albright@world.std.com (R.H. Albright)

To: blake@albion.com

Subject: D.H. Lawrence and Blake

Message-Id: 

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"



This piece of a D.H. Lawrence poem shows how he, too, is concerned with the

dilemma of "staining the water clear", as Blake puts in in the

"Introduction" to _Songs of Innocence_.



from NEW HEAVEN AND EARTH

by D.H. Lawrence



II

I was so weary of the world,

I was so sick of it,

everything was tainted with myself,

skies, trees, flowers, birds, water,

people, houses, streets, vehicles, mechines,

nations, armies, war, peace-talking,

works, recreation, governing, anarchy,

it was all tainted with myself, I knew it all to start with

because it was all myself.



------------------------------



Date: Wed, 10 Jul 1996 12:29:03 -0400

From: albright@world.std.com (R.H. Albright)

To: blake@albion.com

Subject: Re: Quest Literature, Sci-Fi, etc. -Reply

Message-Id: 

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"



You're a very creative person, Hugh. A pleasurable post, indeed!

-Randall Albright



>All Art aspires to the condition of Betty Boop. In Betty Boop begins

>responsibility.  In Xanadu did Betty Boop a stately Pleasure dome decree.  My

>mother bore me in the southern wild, and I am Betty Boop, but oh my soul is

>Koko the clown.Blake is sublime.  Sublimity, delicate poison flower that it

>is, DEMANDS parody.  So we have Lewis Carroll doing Wordsworth: I search the

>fields for Haddocks' eyes...

>Parody is not the negation of Blake, or any other artist.  It is a way of

>testing a product.  Like jumping up and down on a matress in the store....If

>it breaks, it isnt well made, so good riddance.  You can sing pretty nearly

>any Emily Dickenson poem to onward christian soldiers, yellow rose of texas

>or Hernando' Hideaway.

>All great song writers understand parody.

>Best description of sublimity I ever heard was by Geoffrey Hartman.  I'll

>look for the essay....

>

>What are Blake's illustrations if not, literally, cartoons?  [OED:Set of

>cartoons for the tapetries of the Sistine Chapel]

>

>After I wrote that sillyness about the tower it cleared my head.  I realized

>Blake is writing stuff not more than a couple molocules different in chemical

>composition from say, Cowper's The Task, but they are being performed by a

>radical dance / theatre troup in the nude!  A daring 18th century innovation!

> Which explains a pet theory of mine that the Ghost of the Flea was Julian

>Beck of the Living Theatre!

>

>For my bonny Betty Boop I would lie me doon and dee...

>

>In one Betty Boop cartoon Cab Calloway turns into a Walrus and sings St.

>James Infirmary.  The first time I played it for Blake he wept and laughed

>and said, "Eternity is in love with the productions of time, can I borrow

>this video?"

>

>Hugh Walthall      wahu@aol.com



------------------------------



Date: Wed, 10 Jul 1996 12:29:43 -0400

From: albright@world.std.com (R.H. Albright)

To: blake@albion.com

Subject: Re: Quest Literature, Sci-Fi, etc. -Reply -Reply

Message-Id: 

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"



Pam:

Now that you go into details of your own cartoon characters for Blake, I'd

have to say...



>Thel as Little Bo-Beep>>>>> sounds good.



Los.....>>>>>> Superman, for sure. At least after he grows up after

chaining his poor son to that rock.



>Urizen.......>>>>>>>>> I'd say the Emperor Ming from Flash Gordon.



>Enitharmon..............>>>>>>>> I have to think on that. She reminds me

>of the Mother in the film _Spanking the Monkey_, a kind of aging Grace

>Slick who still thinks she knows best (even though Grace was a free love

>advocate and Enitharmon's a control freak) and got her poor MIT Freshman

>student to seduce her (she seduced him, really)! How about Snow White's

>evil stepmother, thinking "Mirror, Mirror on the Wall"? And to think she

>was so beautiful in the "Pity" watercolour! Oh well! We all move through

>STATES..........



>Orc..........>>>>>>>>>>> He's too simple to be a Jesus type. (FIRE! Burn

>down the Urizenic House, Man!) I'd call him a Superman, too. A stud for

>the ages. Typical of the revisionist Blake (yes, we all move through

>STATES.....) that Orc gets virtually forgotten in later, "great" prophetic

>works. Listen to Los trying to forget he had that ultra-stud son in this

>quote from "Milton":



"...I the Fourth Zoa am also set

The Watchman of Eternity, the Three are not! & I am preserved

Still my mighty ones are left to me in Golgonooza

Still Rintrah fierce, and Palamabron mild & piteous

Theotormon filld with care, Bromion loving Science"

        -E 118; K 508, plate 26



Appalling, isn't it? And to think his son led the American and French

Revolutions!



The "Gods of Priam" as well as the Gods of Egypt, which don't even get

mentioned in Blake...... definitely bad guys like The Joker, Riddler, et al

in Batman that must be overthrown in Gotham City.



Talk about fixing a shattered graven image... don't you love plate 18 of

"Milton", stud-like, hair shorn? Humpty Dumpty God CAN be put back together

again!



Or listen to this on plate 24. Rintrah and Palmabron say the cruellest

thing about Orc:

"...knowest thou not that he

Will unchain Orc, & let loose Satan."



Can you believe it? Orc, the leader of the American and French Revolutions,

now reduced (once again) to a mere correlation with Satan! What cartoon

characters are THEY, anyway?



I used to think of Rintrah as a revolutionary-inspired Zeus in "The

Marriage of Heaven and Hell"... but... I guess that was just a state, too.



-Randall Albright



------------------------------



Date: Wed, 10 Jul 1996 14:00:20 -0400 (EDT)

From: Alexander Gourlay 

To: blake@albion.com

Subject: Re: sweet science

Message-Id: 

Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII



The new OED doesn't give much evidence that "sweet science" was yet a cant

term for boxing in Blake's day, though it does include a 1669 instance of

the phrase in what appears to be a religious context, s.v. "respire," from

Theophilus Gale, _The Court of the Gentiles_.  There is a well-established

meaning of "science" as a set of learned _physical_ skills rather than a

high form of knowledge, which is probably the basis of the boxing sense of

"sweet science," including an early instance of "science" in which a punchy

boxer is said to have "lost his science" after a few good blows.



Sandy Gourlay 



------------------------------



Date: Wed, 10 Jul 96 13:05 CST

From: MLGrant@president-po.president.uiowa.edu

To: BLAKE@albion.com, RPYODER@ualr.edu

Subject: Re: blake in chicago?

Message-Id: <199607101813.NAA35027@ns-mx.uiowa.edu>



     Aside from private collections (I've heard of some but don't know how 

     to get into them), you'll find some rejected proofs for *Europe* in 

     the Newberry Library, and a pleasant staff to bring them to you. 

     --Mary Lynn



------------------------------



Date: Wed, 10 Jul 1996 13:10:27 -0500

From: jmichael@seraph1.sewanee.edu (J. Michael)

To: blake@albion.com

Subject: Re: Blake and the Country versus City

Message-Id: <9607101816.AA09514@uu6.psi.com>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"



It isn't necessarily country *versus* city in Blake.  Randall's observation

that Blake wasn't free in the country supports Raymond Williams' argument

that the dichotomy between country and city often masks the power relations

between the classes, substituting an easier opposition for the more complex

social and economic forces that control both places.  Yes, Blake was

ecstatic when he reached Felpham and thought it was "a more spiritual place

than London."  By the end of his time there, however, he was viewing

Felpham as a provincial prison and London as the place of freedom:  "That I

can alone carry on my visionary studies in London unannoyd & that I may

converse with my friends in Eternity.  See Visions, Dream Dreams, &

prophecy & speak Parables unobserv'd & at liberty from the Doubts of other

Mortals" (E 728).  (Interestingly enough, he writes very friendly letters

to Hayley once he gets back to London.)



Blake's London was not so strictly removed from "the country."  The squares

of the West End, near most of Blake's residences, were near open fields and

incorporated green spaces within them; many areas, such as Mayfair, had

once been villages and retained their village-like atmosphere.  Cavendish

Square was famous for the sheep that were kept there, in an attempt to

incorporate a pastoral landscape within the city.  Is that so different

from what Blake does when he places "The Shepherd" and "The Echoing Green"

near "The Chimney Sweeper"?



Jennifer Michael



------------------------------



Date: Wed, 10 Jul 1996 16:02:55 -0400

From: albright@world.std.com (R.H. Albright)

To: blake@albion.com

Subject: Re: Blake and the Country versus City

Message-Id: 

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"



Blake isn't someone like Frank O'Hara in New York City, who celebrates the

exuberance of city life. Or is he? If so... please point me to some

examples. I'm curious.



His contrast of "The Shepherd" and "The Ecchoing Green" with "The Chimney

Sweeper" and "London", for example, indicate that he prefers the wheels of

nature (at least they're spectres of the wheels of eternity?) to the wheels

of industrialized, Newtonian-sleeping man.



I do think Jennifer Michael brings up a good point when she says:



>Blake's London was not so strictly removed from "the country."  The squares

of the West End, near most of Blake's residences, were near open fields and

incorporated green spaces within them; many areas, such as Mayfair, had

once been villages and retained their village-like atmosphere.  Cavendish

Square was famous for the sheep that were kept there, in an attempt to

incorporate a pastoral landscape within the city.>>>>>>>>>>>



But if Cavendish Square is the inspiration for "The Shepherd"...

Wouldn't you say that his fascination with bucolic places...

A Renaissance of his imagination...

And other fantasies of NON-modern nature

are represented in a far more positive light than, say,

watching some of those crooked roads of London

be ripped down in favor of straight ones

that are marked for improvement?



I think the original point of this reaction was to a post wondering if

Blake would like roller blades and other inventions of the modern world.

You can skate well on fairly straight roads of concrete, but you need to

walk slowly, and give attention to detail, as you go through crooked roads.

Even America has at least once city that has roads which were laid out not

by people but by cows (Boston). It infuriates drivers, but is quite

charming from a pedestrian point of view.



What do you think?



-Randall Albright



------------------------------



Date: Wed, 10 Jul 1996 16:07:12 -0600

From: jmichael@seraph1.sewanee.edu (j. michael)

To: blake@albion.com

Subject: Re: Blake and the Country versus City

Message-Id: 

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"



>But if Cavendish Square is the inspiration for "The Shepherd"...

>Wouldn't you say that his fascination with bucolic places...

>A Renaissance of his imagination...

>And other fantasies of NON-modern nature

>are represented in a far more positive light than, say,

>watching some of those crooked roads of London

>be ripped down in favor of straight ones

>that are marked for improvement?



See plate 27 of _Jerusalem_, the lyric that begins something like [I don't

have my text with me]



The fields from Islington to Marybone

To Kensington and St. Johns Wood

Were builded over with pillars of gold

And there Jerusalem's pillars stood



Morton Paley and others read this as a reference to the building of Regents

Park and the surrounding stucco terraces by John Nash around 1811, a

"greening" of West London that incorporates these ancient rural villages

into a new garden city, in contrast to the slums of "ever weeping

Paddington."  (Plate 13 also describes the work of these "golden builders,"

but if you're determined to read Golgonooza as a fantasy city only . . . .)



Jennifer Michael



------------------------------



Date: Wed, 10 Jul 1996 20:34:32 -0400

From: albright@world.std.com (R.H. Albright)

To: blake@albion.com

Subject: Re: Blake and the Country versus City

Message-Id: 

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"



Jennifer Michael wrote this from Blake's Jerusalem:



>The fields from Islington to Marybone

>To Kensington and St. Johns Wood

>Were builded over with pillars of gold

>And there Jerusalem's pillars stood

>

>Morton Paley and others read this as a reference to the building of Regents

>Park and the surrounding stucco terraces by John Nash around 1811, a

>"greening" of West London that incorporates these ancient rural villages

>into a new garden city, in contrast to the slums of "ever weeping

>Paddington."  (Plate 13 also describes the work of these "golden builders,"

>but if you're determined to read Golgonooza as a fantasy city only . . . .)



No, I'm not determined. Utopia, and perhaps Golgonooza, is a place toward

which we should be striving. And I think you make a good point here.



-Randall Albright



------------------------------



Date: Wed, 10 Jul 1996 19:37:41 -0500 (CDT)

From: RPYODER@ualr.edu

To: blake@albion.com

Subject: RE: Blake and the Country versus City

Message-Id: <960710193741.6030806b@ualr.edu>

Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT



Instead of Ackroyd, read Blake.  The Blakes arrived in Felpham on Sept. 20,

1800, late at about 11 or 12 o'clock (Erdman 710-11).  His spirit is certainly

soaring and his language is clearly hyperbolic:  "our cottage . . . is a 

perfect model for Cottages & I think for Palaces of Magnificence only Enlarging

not altering its proportions & adding ornaments & not principals" (E710).

Indeed, in anticipation of the move, he writes to Hayley, "My wife is a flame

of many colours of precious jewels whenever she hears [Eartham, Hayley's 

estate] named," and that "My fingers Emit sparks of fire with Expectation of

my future labors" (E709).  These attitudes explain why the experience was finally so influential.



By May 10, 1801, less that 8 months after arriving, Blake has already begun

what we might call his "perpetually apologetic" mode with Thomas Butts, explaining that he has omitted his duty to his old friend because of his duty to his

new friend.  "Mr Hayley acts like a Prince" (E715) -- is that good or bad?

"Painting Miniatures is become a Goddess in my Eyes & my Friends in Sussex say

that I Excell in the pursuit.  I have a great many orders & they multiply."

By the time Blake leaves Felpham, he has returned to his "giant forms" and the

sense of release is evident in the opening Preface to *Jerusalem*.  But still

in May 1801, he can write, "Felpham in particular is sweetest spot on Earth

at leas

But by Sept. 11, 1801, not quite a year after arriving in Felpham, Blake is

clearly having trouble:  "Time flies faster, (as it seems to me), here than in

London I labour incessantly & accomplish not one half of what intend . . . 

[I endeavour] with my whole might [to] chain my feet to the world of Duty &

Reality, but in vain!"  Put this against the "matchless industry" of Hayley 

mentioned a few lines later, and you can see the problem.  And of course, it

only gets worse when Blake shows Hayley early parts of what was apparently

_Milton_ and _Jerusalem_.



enough for now.



Paul Yoder



------------------------------



Date: Mon, 8 Jul 1996 05:26:55 -0600

From: "Jeffrey Skoblow" 

To: blake@albion.com

Subject: Re: blake in chicago?

Message-Id: <9607110431.AA13152@daisy.ac.siue.edu>



There is a small piece or two of Blake's at the Chicago Art 

Institute-- one little b+w print and one small painting, I think-- 

and also a couple of big Fuseli paintings in the same room.  Also 

dark satanic mills and chartered streets all over town...

Jeffrey Skoblow

(I'm sure there's some Reynolds at the Art Institute too-- there are 

a couple of rooms of late-18th century British painting (and a room 

of French revolutionary-era pieces) that provide an interesting quick 

study of some moods and methods and subjects of the time...)



> Date:          Wed, 10 Jul 1996 09:32:25 -0500 (CDT)

> From:          RPYODER@ualr.edu

> Subject:       blake in chicago?

> To:            BLAKE@albion.com

> Reply-to:      blake@albion.com



> Hi,

> What can anybody tell me about Blake collections in the Chicago area?  I'm

> team-teaching a course on poetry and painting in the spring, and the art 

> department is considering sponsoring a trip to Chicago.  The course will

> have a large component on Blake and Reynolds (the teachers' hobby-horses), so

> we would like some idea of what might be available.

> Thanks,

> Paul Yoder

> 

> 

> 



------------------------------



Date: Thu, 11 Jul 1996 09:44:50 +0200

From: P Van Schaik 

To: blake@albion.com, jmichael@seraph1.sewanee.edu

Subject:  Re: Blake and the Country versus City -Reply

Message-Id: 



Surely the references to Jerusalem in the passages you quoted are to

the appearance of the holy city as she was in Innocnece in Eternity -

before Urizen's misconceptions of the contraries brought her pillars low?

Pam van Schaik



------------------------------



Date: Thu, 11 Jul 1996 11:55:18 -0500

From: Mary Beth Jipping 

To: blake@albion.com

Subject: Re: BLKAKE CONTRA EMPIRICISM, OR 'THER IS NO NATURAL RELIGION'

Message-Id: <199607111655.LAA07903@biochem4.iupui.edu>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT



At 07:47 AM 7/8/96 -0700, you wrote:

>Blake, of course, is not interested the relation of scientific

>theories to empirical verification, but rather in the defense of

>the faculty of poetic imagination, hence the other propositions

>about desire and infinity.  However, knowing no other discourse

>besides antinomian Christianity and British empiricism, Blake

>lacks the tooks to cast his ideas in the form of a logically

>elaborated dialectical philosophy, so he formulates his

>propositions in terms of the poetic genius and prophetic

>imagination.  Hence, first series, proposition VI: "Conclusion.

>If it were not for the Poetic or Prophetic character the

>Philosophical & Experimental would soon be at the ratio of all

>things, & stand still, unable to do other than repeat the same

>dull round over again."



 ----Thank you, Mr. Dumain, for a clear, understandable posting.  This is

why I subscribe.

 ----MBJ



------------------------------



Date: Thu, 11 Jul 1996 09:24:18 -0500

From: jmichael@seraph1.sewanee.edu (J. Michael)

To: P Van Schaik 

Cc: blake@albion.com

Subject: Re: Blake and the Country versus City -Reply

Message-Id: <9607111432.AA11518@uu6.psi.com>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"



>Surely the references to Jerusalem in the passages you quoted are to

>the appearance of the holy city as she was in Innocnece in Eternity -

>before Urizen's misconceptions of the contraries brought her pillars low?

>Pam van Schaik



Yes, but that state is being restored in the present:



What are those golden Builders doing

Near mornful ever-weeping Paddington

Standing above that mighty Ruin

Where Satan the first victory won.



And where, a few lines later, are London Stone and Tyburns Brook if not in

London?  These places have real historical significance.  If the "fall" can

take place in the real world of London, so can the regeneration.



Blake's vision of an ideal community cannot be reduced to passive nostalgia

for a lost time.  My point was that the lyric on J27 describes not the

destruction but the restoration of a childhood paradise:  a restoration

that goes beyond merely turning back the clock, because it incorporates all

that has developed, historically and geographically, in the meantime.



Jennifer Michael



--------------------------------

End of blake-d Digest V1996 Issue #84

*************************************